When you're so trad you bring back a tradition of court eunuchs as key advisors to the ruler https://t.co/cDT26Uyb99— Lomez (@L0m3z) January 30, 2020
Via Steve Sailer, I see she's talking about criminal penalties for "fake news"--having identified it as "voter suppression". From Warren's website:
Push to create civil and criminal penalties for knowingly disseminating false information about when and how to vote in U.S. elections: Voter suppression efforts of any kind offend basic American values. In both the 2016 and 2018 elections, online disinformation sought to depress voter turnout by telling people they could vote via text, giving people the wrong date for election day, and more. I will push for new laws that impose tough civil and criminal penalties for knowingly disseminating this kind of information, which has the explicit purpose of undermining the basic right to vote.Warren would have seemed a strong candidate for being the rational candidate on the Democratic dais. But she hasn't acquitted herself well either as a frontrunner or a fadeout as I see it.
When she was leading and the press was feeding her lines, she was at times obnoxious (in progressive clickbait-ese, "and it's priceless").
Maybe politics doesn't ruin people as much as reveal them. Easy to field a lob from a gay courtier.
But a few rowdy negroes and she's like a deer (with some possible Native American ancestry) in the headlights:
"What do we do?" She asks the Strong Black Woman "who know what it is" to not be able to tell her story. Or something.
Well naturally we should elect this powerful personality president! What could go wrong?
Add to this her desperate attempt to throw Bernie under the bus by claiming he said something innocuous two years ago in private conversation, quickly abandoned after getting no traction.
Remember when the word "presidential" used to come up a lot more every four years? There's probably a reason for that.
No comments:
Post a Comment